Vajrappa vs Muniyamma — 249/2021
Case under U/o Section 7rule1r/w. Status: ARGUMENT. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN020006342021
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
247/2021
Filing Date
05-08-2021
Registration No
249/2021
Registration Date
05-08-2021
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vajrappa
Adv. Padmanabha
Nagarathnamma
Narayanappa. M
Nagaraju
Narasimhaiah
Yerramma
Venkatesh
Ravikumar
Respondent(s)
Muniyamma
Narayana
Vajrappa
Vajramma
G. Siddalingappa
R.B.S. Ekoram
Hearing History
Judge: 105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
ARGUMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | ARGUMENT |
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 249/2021 Summary On 16-04-2026, the court examined the first defense witness (DW-1). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving alleged fraudulent sale deed. The witness's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies regarding knowledge of the plaintiffs, defendants, property ownership history, and whether the sale deed was executed fraudulently. The witness denied knowledge of key facts about the parties' relationships and the property's legal status. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it into evidence after the witness confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 249/2021 Summary On 16-04-2026, the court examined the first defense witness (DW-1). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving alleged fraudulent sale deed. The witness's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies regarding knowledge of the plaintiffs, defendants, property ownership history, and whether the sale deed was executed fraudulently. The witness denied knowledge of key facts about the parties' relationships and the property's legal status. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it into evidence after the witness confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts