Vajrappa vs Muniyamma — 249/2021
Case under U/o Section 7rule1r/w. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN020006342021
Filing Number
247/2021
Filing Date
05-Aug-2021
Registration No
249/2021
Registration Date
05-Aug-2021
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vajrappa
Adv. Padmanabha
-
2.Nagarathnamma
-
3.Narayanappa. M
-
4.Nagaraju
-
5.Narasimhaiah
-
6.Yerramma
-
7.Venkatesh
-
8.Ravikumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muniyamma
-
2.Narayana
-
3.Vajrappa
-
4.Vajramma
-
5.G. Siddalingappa
-
6.R.B.S. Ekoram
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case 249/2021 Summary On 16-04-2026, the court examined the first defense witness (DW-1). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving alleged fraudulent sale deed. The witness's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies regarding knowledge of the plaintiffs, defendants, property ownership history, and whether the sale deed was executed fraudulently. The witness denied knowledge of key facts about the parties' relationships and the property's legal status. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it into evidence after the witness confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
28-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
05-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
10-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
30-Jan-2025
IssueView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
04-Dec-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Issues
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
20-Nov-2024
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
25-Sep-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
06-Aug-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
19-Jun-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
02-Apr-2024
A.D.R
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
14-Mar-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
21-Feb-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
20-Jan-2024
IAs
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
09-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
21-Nov-2023
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
27-Sep-2023
Summons
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
27-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
12-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
08-Feb-2023
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
14-Dec-2022
Evidence
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
10-Nov-2022
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
28-Sep-2022
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
25-Jul-2022
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
06-Jun-2022
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
08-Feb-2022
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
20-Dec-2021
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
25-Oct-2021
Second List
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
06-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 249/2021
Case 249/2021 Summary On 16-04-2026, the court examined the first defense witness (DW-1). The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving alleged fraudulent sale deed. The witness's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies regarding knowledge of the plaintiffs, defendants, property ownership history, and whether the sale deed was executed fraudulently. The witness denied knowledge of key facts about the parties' relationships and the property's legal status. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted it into evidence after the witness confirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts