JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Rptd by R Mukunthan vs Venkatalakshmi.V — 127/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec.14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020006072026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Decision Date
27-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Rptd by R Mukunthan
Adv. Kavitha H N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venkatalakshmi.V
-
2.Dhanaraj V
-
3.Manjula V
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting it physical possession of a Kanakapura property mortgaged as security for a Rs. 7,89,999 loan that the respondents defaulted on, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 7,86,641. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to take possession with police assistance, finding the petitioner was a valid secured creditor with proper documentation and compliance with statutory requirements including demand notice and symbolic possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
05-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
30-May-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
The court allowed JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting it physical possession of a Kanakapura property mortgaged as security for a Rs. 7,89,999 loan that the respondents defaulted on, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 7,86,641. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to take possession with police assistance, finding the petitioner was a valid secured creditor with proper documentation and compliance with statutory requirements including demand notice and symbolic possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts