The Suryoday Small Finance Bank Ltd Reptd by its authorized Officer Sagar Karennavar vs Ramesh Nayaka — 57/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec.14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 15th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020002452026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
57/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Suryoday Small Finance Bank Ltd Reptd by its authorized Officer Sagar Karennavar
Adv. KISHOR KUMAR S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Nayaka
-
2.Shobha Bai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
CASE SUMMARY The court allowed Suryoday Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take physical possession of a mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 4 lakh loan, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 3,55,964, classifying the account as a Non-Performing Asset. The bank had complied with all statutory requirements including demand notice and symbolic possession. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured asset with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2026
CASE SUMMARY The court allowed Suryoday Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take physical possession of a mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 4 lakh loan, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 3,55,964, classifying the account as a Non-Performing Asset. The bank had complied with all statutory requirements including demand notice and symbolic possession. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the secured asset with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts