HDFC Bank Limited Reptd by its Authorized Signatory Mr Anantha Krishna B vs C Karna Devareddy — 52/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec.14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020002282026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
52/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HDFC Bank Limited Reptd by its Authorized Signatory Mr Anantha Krishna B
Adv. AVINASH KUMAR R
Respondent(s)
C Karna Devareddy
C Devasena Reddy
C Chandramohan Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Disposed
ORDERS
ARGUMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted HDFC Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take physical possession of a 2-acre property in Keeranagere Village, Ramanagara District. The respondents had defaulted on a ₹1.5 crore term loan secured against the property, leaving an outstanding balance of ₹1,22,73,988.48, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance and directed proper documentation including inventory and panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted HDFC Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take physical possession of a 2-acre property in Keeranagere Village, Ramanagara District. The respondents had defaulted on a ₹1.5 crore term loan secured against the property, leaving an outstanding balance of ₹1,22,73,988.48, classified as a Non-Performing Asset. The court appointed an advocate as Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance and directed proper documentation including inventory and panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts