Jana Small Finance Bank Limited Reptd by Authorized Officer Ranjan Hanumanth Naik vs Kumara — 49/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section U/Sec.14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN020002252026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jana Small Finance Bank Limited Reptd by Authorized Officer Ranjan Hanumanth Naik
Adv. SABITHA K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumara
-
2.Yashoda
-
3.Lakshmamma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take physical possession of a property in Ramanagara District that was mortgaged as security for a Rs. 5 lakh loan. The respondents (Kumara, Yashoda, and Lakshmamma) defaulted on the loan with an outstanding balance of Rs. 5,27,861.08, and despite demand notices issued in October 2025, failed to repay or respond within 60 days. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession with police assistance and fixed the commissioner's fee at Rs. 5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
26-May-2026
Orders
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
05-May-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Argument
Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2026
The court allowed Jana Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take physical possession of a property in Ramanagara District that was mortgaged as security for a Rs. 5 lakh loan. The respondents (Kumara, Yashoda, and Lakshmamma) defaulted on the loan with an outstanding balance of Rs. 5,27,861.08, and despite demand notices issued in October 2025, failed to repay or respond within 60 days. The court appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession with police assistance and fixed the commissioner's fee at Rs. 5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts