Thimmappa vs Sowbhagya Advocate - H.B SHIVANNA — 2/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 43,Rule,1(r). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 26th March 2026.

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KARN020000712025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

18-01-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA

Judge

768-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/o 43,Rule,1(r)

Petitioner(s)

Thimmappa

Adv. R RAVI SHANKAR

Venkatappa

Respondent(s)

Sowbhagya Advocate - H.B SHIVANNA

Hearing History

Judge: 768-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

26-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDERS

21-02-2026

ORDERS

18-02-2026

ORDERS

10-02-2026

ORDERS

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: M.A.No.2/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's order granting a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff (Sowbhagya). The plaintiff established a prima facie case showing she owned the property through a registered gift deed (1988) and a prior favorable judgment (OS.No.117/1988), with possession delivered to her in 1996. The defendants failed to prove they possessed the property, making the injunction order legally sound and not arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A.No.2/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's order granting a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff (Sowbhagya). The plaintiff established a prima facie case showing she owned the property through a registered gift deed (1988) and a prior favorable judgment (OS.No.117/1988), with possession delivered to her in 1996. The defendants failed to prove they possessed the property, making the injunction order legally sound and not arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case