Lakshmamma vs Basamma — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7,Rule,1,R/w,Section,26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 29th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN020000382025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
10-01-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
10-01-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA
Judge
105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmamma
Adv. R.SHIVAKUMAR
Gowramma
Respondent(s)
Basamma
V Shivanna
Sujatha
Lavanya
Rathan Gowda
Rajesh Kumar
Ramesh Chand
Hearing History
Judge: 105-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
Disposed
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT
ARGUMENT
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Lakshmamma and Gowramma v. Basamma and Others (OS 17/2025) The court decreed the plaintiffs' partition suit, holding that two ancestral agricultural properties are joint family assets belonging equally to the three siblings—the two plaintiff daughters and defendant son Shivanna. The court found that Shivanna's 2017 sale of the properties to a third party without the plaintiffs' consent was invalid, as ancestral property cannot be alienated without all co-heirs' consent; each sibling receives 1/4th share, with Basamma (the widow) also entitled to 1/4th share, which shall pass to the subsequent purchaser by equitable partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Lakshmamma and Gowramma v. Basamma and Others (OS 17/2025) The court decreed the plaintiffs' partition suit, holding that two ancestral agricultural properties are joint family assets belonging equally to the three siblings—the two plaintiff daughters and defendant son Shivanna. The court found that Shivanna's 2017 sale of the properties to a third party without the plaintiffs' consent was invalid, as ancestral property cannot be alienated without all co-heirs' consent; each sibling receives 1/4th share, with Basamma (the widow) also entitled to 1/4th share, which shall pass to the subsequent purchaser by equitable partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts