R G Manjula vs Vaishnodevi Peramount — 5/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Order.7 rule 1,R/W,Sec.26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN020000122026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA

Judge

105-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Order.7 rule 1,R/W,Sec.26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R G Manjula

    Adv. S. LOKESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vaishnodevi Peramount

  2. 2.Vimal Jain Kathariya

  3. 3.Vimal Kumar Madhujain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.No.5/2026 The court accepted a compromise petition filed by the plaintiff (through her S.P.A holder Manohar) and Defendant No.2 (representing himself and Defendant No.3) before the daily Lok-Adalat. After the compromise terms were read, explained in Kannada, and accepted by both parties as lawful and correct, the suit was disposed of accordingly, with the office directed to draw an award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    A.D.R

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No.5/2026 The court accepted a compromise petition filed by the plaintiff (through her S.P.A holder Manohar) and Defendant No.2 (representing himself and Defendant No.3) before the daily Lok-Adalat. After the compromise terms were read, explained in Kannada, and accepted by both parties as lawful and correct, the suit was disposed of accordingly, with the office directed to draw an award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case