Revenue Inspector vs Raju Advocate - G.RAGHAVENDRA — 105/2019

Case under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Section 21(1). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KARN010033392019

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

105/2019

Filing Date

09-12-2019

Registration No

105/2019

Registration Date

10-12-2019

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

Revenue Inspector

Adv. Spl.P.P

Respondent(s)

Raju Advocate - G.RAGHAVENDRA

Hearing History

Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

A.D.R

07-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

20-11-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

11-09-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Summary of Case 105/2019: The Lok-Adalath court acquitted the accused after he paid a fine of Rs. 1,01,000 before the complainant office. Both the accused's advocate and complainant filed memos confirming the fine payment, and upon verification of the receipt, the court allowed the settlement and discharged the accused from the offense under Section 21(1) of MM (D and R) 1957 and Rules 43(8) of KMMCR 2017. The bail bond was subsequently cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-10-2022
Evidence
10-10-2022
Charge
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 105/2019: The Lok-Adalath court acquitted the accused after he paid a fine of Rs. 1,01,000 before the complainant office. Both the accused's advocate and complainant filed memos confirming the fine payment, and upon verification of the receipt, the court allowed the settlement and discharged the accused from the offense under Section 21(1) of MM (D and R) 1957 and Rules 43(8) of KMMCR 2017. The bail bond was subsequently cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case