Mahesh H.B. vs Gangalakshmamma — 76/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/sec.96. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KARN010025192025

Filing Number

79/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

76/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/sec.96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh H.B.

    Adv. Narasimhamurthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangalakshmamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: RA 76/25 (Mahesh H.B. v. Gangalakshmamma) The Lok-Adalath disposed of the appeal through a joint settlement between parties. Appellant Mahesh H.B. paid respondent Gangalakshmamma Rs. 2,00,000 in cash and a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000, which the respondent received. Both parties signed the joint memo accepting the settlement terms. The court allowed the joint memo and disposed the appeal accordingly, with full court fee returned to the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    A.D.R

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    A.D.R

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RA 76/25 (Mahesh H.B. v. Gangalakshmamma) The Lok-Adalath disposed of the appeal through a joint settlement between parties. Appellant Mahesh H.B. paid respondent Gangalakshmamma Rs. 2,00,000 in cash and a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000, which the respondent received. Both parties signed the joint memo accepting the settlement terms. The court allowed the joint memo and disposed the appeal accordingly, with full court fee returned to the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case