Union Bank Of India Represented by its Branch Manager SRi. Dhamana Prasad vs M/S Sri. Boralingeshwara Shamiyana Centre — 4/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7 Rule 1 of CPC. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KARN010024482022
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
4/2022
Filing Date
08-09-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
13-09-2022
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union Bank Of India Represented by its Branch Manager SRi. Dhamana Prasad
Adv. Shivashankara. A
Respondent(s)
M/S Sri. Boralingeshwara Shamiyana Centre
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE CIVIL
A.D.R
A.D.R
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 14-03-2026 | A.D.R |
| 31-01-2026 | A.D.R |
| 29-11-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 18-10-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Com OS 4/22 Date: 05.12.2024 On this date, the court heard the examination-in-chief of Petitioner's Witness 1 (PW1). The witness testified and affirmed the contents of their affidavit as truthful. The witness presented 24 documentary exhibits including loan agreements, promissory notes, demand notices, and delivery letters dated between 2015-2022, which were marked as exhibits. The respondents and their counsel were absent; consequently, the cross-examination was postponed. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Com OS 4/22 Date: 05.12.2024 On this date, the court heard the examination-in-chief of Petitioner's Witness 1 (PW1). The witness testified and affirmed the contents of their affidavit as truthful. The witness presented 24 documentary exhibits including loan agreements, promissory notes, demand notices, and delivery letters dated between 2015-2022, which were marked as exhibits. The respondents and their counsel were absent; consequently, the cross-examination was postponed. The court adjourned the case for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts