T. Devaraj vs The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners — 103/2018
Case under U/s Section 19of,INDIAN,ELECTRICITY,ACT,AND,U/Sec,16(3)OF,INDIAN,TELEGRAPHIC,ACT. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KARN010021092018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
103/2018
Filing Date
24-11-2018
Registration No
103/2018
Registration Date
24-11-2018
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. Devaraj
Adv. M.E. NIJALINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners
The Deputy General Manager, M/s Power Grid NM Transmission Ltd.,
Adv. J Hudson Samuel and Partners
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-12-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc.103/2018 (T. Devaraj v. POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED) On 15.11.2024, the court recorded the cross-examination of witness PW-1 in this land acquisition/compensation dispute. The respondent's counsel challenged the petitioner's claims regarding land survey numbers 58/6, questioning the extent of land affected, crop compensation amounts (₹2,39,250 and ₹18,304 claimed), and total compensation of ₹2,66,409 deposited. The witness testified regarding land acreage, compensation details, and 2018 land valuation (₹75,000 per guntha). The court accepted the witness's testimony as recorded. No further cross-examination scheduled; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc.103/2018 (T. Devaraj v. POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED) On 15.11.2024, the court recorded the cross-examination of witness PW-1 in this land acquisition/compensation dispute. The respondent's counsel challenged the petitioner's claims regarding land survey numbers 58/6, questioning the extent of land affected, crop compensation amounts (₹2,39,250 and ₹18,304 claimed), and total compensation of ₹2,66,409 deposited. The witness testified regarding land acreage, compensation details, and 2018 land valuation (₹75,000 per guntha). The court accepted the witness's testimony as recorded. No further cross-examination scheduled; case proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts