Dananjaya vs The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners — 101/2018

Case under U/s Section 19of,INDIAN,ELECTRICITY,ACT,U/Sec,16(3)OF,INDIAN,TELEGRAPHIC,.ACT. Status: Arguments.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Arguments. Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KARN010021072018

Filing Number

101/2018

Filing Date

24-Nov-2018

Registration No

101/2018

Registration Date

24-Nov-2018

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s Section 19of,INDIAN,ELECTRICITY,ACT,U/Sec,16(3)OF,INDIAN,TELEGRAPHIC,.ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dananjaya

    Adv. M.E. NIJALINGAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners

  2. 2.The Deputy General Manager, M/s. Power Grid NM Transmission Limited

    Adv. J Hudson Samuel and Partners

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 15-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: Misc.101/18 - Dananjaya v. POWERGRID NM Transmission Limited This land acquisition dispute involves petitioner Dananjaya challenging compensation paid by POWERGRID for transmission line installation on his property (Survey No. 58/1). The case proceeded through witness examination across multiple hearings (January 2022 to November 2024). Dananjaya testified that POWERGRID laid a transmission line across 17 guntas of his land but compensated him for only 16 guntas, paying total compensation of ₹3,91,556 for unauthorized occupation, crop damage, and plant destruction. The case remains pending with cross-examination and no final judgment has been delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 16-Dec-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 04-Aug-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 26-May-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 11-Aug-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 19-Apr-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 19-Feb-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 07-Jan-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 06-Nov-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 17-Sep-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 04-Aug-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 18-Jun-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 20-Mar-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 06-Feb-2021

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  35. 20-Nov-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 15-Oct-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 28-Aug-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  38. 10-Jul-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 03-Apr-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  40. 03-Jan-2020

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  41. 16-Nov-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  42. 27-Sep-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  43. 02-Aug-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  44. 15-Jun-2019

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  45. 15-Mar-2019

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  46. 19-Jan-2019

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  47. 29-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 24-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Misc.101/18 - Dananjaya v. POWERGRID NM Transmission Limited This land acquisition dispute involves petitioner Dananjaya challenging compensation paid by POWERGRID for transmission line installation on his property (Survey No. 58/1). The case proceeded through witness examination across multiple hearings (January 2022 to November 2024). Dananjaya testified that POWERGRID laid a transmission line across 17 guntas of his land but compensated him for only 16 guntas, paying total compensation of ₹3,91,556 for unauthorized occupation, crop damage, and plant destruction. The case remains pending with cross-examination and no final judgment has been delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case