Dananjaya vs The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners — 101/2018
Case under U/s Section 19of,INDIAN,ELECTRICITY,ACT,U/Sec,16(3)OF,INDIAN,TELEGRAPHIC,.ACT. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KARN010021072018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
101/2018
Filing Date
24-11-2018
Registration No
101/2018
Registration Date
24-11-2018
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dananjaya
Adv. M.E. NIJALINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
The Chief Manager, POWERGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners
The Deputy General Manager, M/s. Power Grid NM Transmission Limited
Adv. J Hudson Samuel and Partners
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-12-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc.101/18 - Dananjaya v. POWERGRID NM Transmission Limited This land acquisition dispute involves petitioner Dananjaya challenging compensation paid by POWERGRID for transmission line installation on his property (Survey No. 58/1). The case proceeded through witness examination across multiple hearings (January 2022 to November 2024). Dananjaya testified that POWERGRID laid a transmission line across 17 guntas of his land but compensated him for only 16 guntas, paying total compensation of ₹3,91,556 for unauthorized occupation, crop damage, and plant destruction. The case remains pending with cross-examination and no final judgment has been delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc.101/18 - Dananjaya v. POWERGRID NM Transmission Limited This land acquisition dispute involves petitioner Dananjaya challenging compensation paid by POWERGRID for transmission line installation on his property (Survey No. 58/1). The case proceeded through witness examination across multiple hearings (January 2022 to November 2024). Dananjaya testified that POWERGRID laid a transmission line across 17 guntas of his land but compensated him for only 16 guntas, paying total compensation of ₹3,91,556 for unauthorized occupation, crop damage, and plant destruction. The case remains pending with cross-examination and no final judgment has been delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts