Lakhmana vs The Chief Manager, POWEGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners — 99/2018
Case under U/s Section 19of,INDIAN,ELECTRICITY,ACT,U/S,16(3)of,INDIAN,TELEGRAPHIC,ACT. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KARN010021052018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
99/2018
Filing Date
24-11-2018
Registration No
99/2018
Registration Date
24-11-2018
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakhmana
Adv. M.E. NIJALINGAPPA
Respondent(s)
The Chief Manager, POWEGRID NM TRANSMISSION LIMITED Advocate - J Hudson Samuel and Partners
The Deputy General Manager, M/s Power Grid NM Transmission Ltd.,
Adv. J Hudson Samuel and Partners
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-12-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary of Misc.99/18 - Lakhmana v. POWEGRID NM Transmission Limited As of the court order dated 15.11.2024, this case involves a dispute regarding land compensation. The petitioner Lakhmana claims that unauthorized amounts totaling ₹2,36,799 were deposited into an account related to his land (survey nos. 57/5 and 56/2). The respondent (POWEGRID) contested these claims regarding crop loss compensation (₹13,581) and boundary damage compensation (₹880). The court proceedings included witness examination and cross-examination; however, the case appears to be ongoing with no final judgment or dismissal order issued as of the latest court date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Misc.99/18 - Lakhmana v. POWEGRID NM Transmission Limited As of the court order dated 15.11.2024, this case involves a dispute regarding land compensation. The petitioner Lakhmana claims that unauthorized amounts totaling ₹2,36,799 were deposited into an account related to his land (survey nos. 57/5 and 56/2). The respondent (POWEGRID) contested these claims regarding crop loss compensation (₹13,581) and boundary damage compensation (₹880). The court proceedings included witness examination and cross-examination; however, the case appears to be ongoing with no final judgment or dismissal order issued as of the latest court date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts