Ramanagara Town P S vs Navaz alias Navaz Pasha alias Koli Navaz S/o Ejaj — 74/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/Sec. 397. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
SC - SESSION CASE
CNR: KARN010017632024
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
e-Filing Number
09-09-2024
Filing Number
74/2024
Filing Date
09-09-2024
Registration No
74/2024
Registration Date
09-09-2024
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
0088
Police Station
RAMANAGAR TOWN PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramanagara Town P S
Respondent(s)
Navaz alias Navaz Pasha alias Koli Navaz S/o Ejaj
Mathin Pasha S/o Moulapasha
Hearing History
Judge: 1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
HEARING
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
HEARING
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: S.C. No. 74/2024 Bail was granted to both accused No. 1 (Navaz alias Navaz Pasha) and accused No. 4 (Mathin Pasha) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a Section 397 IPC (dacoity) case. Both accused had previously been granted bail but absconded, leading to non-bailable warrants (NBW). They were arrested and remanded to judicial custody—accused No. 1 on 28.01.2026 and accused No. 4 on 25.06.2025. The court accepted their explanations for absence (accused No. 1 claimed illness; accused No. 4 claimed he was in custody in another case) and found no sufficient grounds to deny bail. Each was enlarged on personal bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety for a like sum, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: S.C. No. 74/2024 Bail was granted to both accused No. 1 (Navaz alias Navaz Pasha) and accused No. 4 (Mathin Pasha) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a Section 397 IPC (dacoity) case. Both accused had previously been granted bail but absconded, leading to non-bailable warrants (NBW). They were arrested and remanded to judicial custody—accused No. 1 on 28.01.2026 and accused No. 4 on 25.06.2025. The court accepted their explanations for absence (accused No. 1 claimed illness; accused No. 4 claimed he was in custody in another case) and found no sufficient grounds to deny bail. Each was enlarged on personal bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety for a like sum, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts