Ramanagara Town P S vs Navaz alias Navaz Pasha alias Koli Navaz S/o Ejaj — 74/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/Sec. 397. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

SC - SESSION CASE

CNR: KARN010017632024

HEARING

Next Hearing

15th July 2026

e-Filing Number

09-09-2024

Filing Number

74/2024

Filing Date

09-09-2024

Registration No

74/2024

Registration Date

09-09-2024

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

0088

Police Station

RAMANAGAR TOWN PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section U/Sec. 397

Petitioner(s)

Ramanagara Town P S

Respondent(s)

Navaz alias Navaz Pasha alias Koli Navaz S/o Ejaj

Mathin Pasha S/o Moulapasha

Hearing History

Judge: 1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

04-06-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

12-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

ORDERS.

04-03-2026

ORDERS.

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Orders

CASE SUMMARY: S.C. No. 74/2024 Bail was granted to both accused No. 1 (Navaz alias Navaz Pasha) and accused No. 4 (Mathin Pasha) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a Section 397 IPC (dacoity) case. Both accused had previously been granted bail but absconded, leading to non-bailable warrants (NBW). They were arrested and remanded to judicial custody—accused No. 1 on 28.01.2026 and accused No. 4 on 25.06.2025. The court accepted their explanations for absence (accused No. 1 claimed illness; accused No. 4 claimed he was in custody in another case) and found no sufficient grounds to deny bail. Each was enlarged on personal bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety for a like sum, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: S.C. No. 74/2024 Bail was granted to both accused No. 1 (Navaz alias Navaz Pasha) and accused No. 4 (Mathin Pasha) under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a Section 397 IPC (dacoity) case. Both accused had previously been granted bail but absconded, leading to non-bailable warrants (NBW). They were arrested and remanded to judicial custody—accused No. 1 on 28.01.2026 and accused No. 4 on 25.06.2025. The court accepted their explanations for absence (accused No. 1 claimed illness; accused No. 4 claimed he was in custody in another case) and found no sufficient grounds to deny bail. Each was enlarged on personal bail bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety for a like sum, subject to standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case