G.S.Basavalingappa vs Assit.Commissioner and Competent Authority — 23/2013

Case under U/s 10, 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Status: Orders.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Orders. Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KARN010008962013

Filing Number

23/2013

Filing Date

10-Jun-2013

Registration No

23/2013

Registration Date

10-Jun-2013

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 10, 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.S.Basavalingappa

    Adv. Rajanna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Assit.Commissioner and Competent Authority

  2. 2.Magers Gail India Ltd,.

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: G.S. Basavalingappa v. Assistant Commissioner and Competent Authority and Margers Gail India Ltd. (Misc. 23/2013) The petitioner sought enhanced compensation for forest land acquisition involving approximately 1 acre 1 guntha in Gundigarje village. The court examined multiple hearing dates between June 2025 and March 2026, during which the respondent presented documentary evidence (12 exhibits) regarding notifications, notices, valuations, and compensation calculations. The petitioner's counsel cross-examined the respondent's witness and challenged the adequacy of compensation offered. On March 6, 2026, the court concluded that the petitioner was not entitled to enhanced compensation and dismissed the petition, finding no further grounds for additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 27-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 03-May-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 27-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 09-Nov-2023

    Restored

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  35. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 13-Dec-2019

    OrdersView PDF

  38. 13-Dec-2019

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 06-Dec-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  40. 30-Nov-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  41. 08-Nov-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  42. 20-Sep-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  43. 17-Aug-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  44. 12-Jul-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  45. 12-Apr-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  46. 01-Mar-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  47. 01-Feb-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  48. 04-Jan-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  49. 09-Nov-2018

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  50. 10-Aug-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  51. 29-Jun-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  52. 13-Apr-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  53. 16-Mar-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  54. 27-Jan-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  55. 18-Nov-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  56. 13-Oct-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  57. 07-Jul-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  58. 07-Apr-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  59. 17-Feb-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  60. 13-Jan-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  61. 09-Dec-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  62. 07-Oct-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  63. 06-Aug-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  64. 01-Jul-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  65. 16-Apr-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  66. 19-Feb-2016

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  67. 18-Dec-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  68. 30-Oct-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  69. 21-Aug-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  70. 26-Jun-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  71. 10-Apr-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  72. 05-Feb-2015

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  73. 11-Dec-2014

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  74. 23-Sep-2014

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  75. 28-Jun-2014

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  76. 19-Apr-2014

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  77. 01-Mar-2014

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  78. 07-Dec-2013

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  79. 26-Oct-2013

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  80. 03-Sep-2013

    Summons

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  81. 11-Jun-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  82. 10-Jun-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: G.S. Basavalingappa v. Assistant Commissioner and Competent Authority and Margers Gail India Ltd. (Misc. 23/2013) The petitioner sought enhanced compensation for forest land acquisition involving approximately 1 acre 1 guntha in Gundigarje village. The court examined multiple hearing dates between June 2025 and March 2026, during which the respondent presented documentary evidence (12 exhibits) regarding notifications, notices, valuations, and compensation calculations. The petitioner's counsel cross-examined the respondent's witness and challenged the adequacy of compensation offered. On March 6, 2026, the court concluded that the petitioner was not entitled to enhanced compensation and dismissed the petition, finding no further grounds for additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case