Jayamma vs Assit.Commissioner and Competent Authority — 22/2013
Case under U/s 10, 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Status: ORDERS.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KARN010008952013
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
22/2013
Filing Date
10-06-2013
Registration No
22/2013
Registration Date
10-06-2013
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayamma
Adv. Rajanna
Respondent(s)
Assit.Commissioner and Competent Authority
Magers Gail India Ltd,.
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ORDERS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 27-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc. 22/13 RW1 Petitioner: Jayamma Respondents: Assistant Commissioner, Competent Authority, and Managers Gail India Ltd. Outcome: The petition proceedings are ongoing with witness examination in progress. As of the last order dated 06.03.2026, the court has been hearing arguments from both the petitioner's and respondent's counsel regarding compensation claims. The respondent authority submitted that compensation has already been awarded per district collector's orders, while the petitioner claims inadequate compensation for agricultural land and trees. The case involves disputes over land valuation, compensation calculations, and tree valuations in connection with a land acquisition project. No final judgment has been delivered; cross-examination continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc. 22/13 RW1 Petitioner: Jayamma Respondents: Assistant Commissioner, Competent Authority, and Managers Gail India Ltd. Outcome: The petition proceedings are ongoing with witness examination in progress. As of the last order dated 06.03.2026, the court has been hearing arguments from both the petitioner's and respondent's counsel regarding compensation claims. The respondent authority submitted that compensation has already been awarded per district collector's orders, while the petitioner claims inadequate compensation for agricultural land and trees. The case involves disputes over land valuation, compensation calculations, and tree valuations in connection with a land acquisition project. No final judgment has been delivered; cross-examination continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts