Huchamma vs Gangadharaiah — 34/2018

Case under U/s 96 of Cpc. Status: Arguments.. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Arguments. Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KARN010008462018

Filing Number

35/2018

Filing Date

27-Apr-2018

Registration No

34/2018

Registration Date

27-Apr-2018

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 96 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Huchamma

    Adv. C. SUNIL KUMAR

  2. 2.Ramaiah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangadharaiah

  2. 2.Byraiah

  3. 3.Hombalamma

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 25-Jul-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 21-Mar-2025

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 25-Jan-2025

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 30-Nov-2024

    Restored

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Nov-2024

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 30-Nov-2024

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 29-May-2018

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary - RA 34/2018: The appeal by Huchamma and Ramaiah challenging a November 2017 judgment from the Principal Senior Civil Judge Court, Ramanagara was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Court found that since the total subject matter value was Rs. 37 lakhs (exceeding the 10 lakh rupee threshold), the appeal should be heard by the High Court, not the District Court. The appellants were directed to resubmit their appeal before the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 29-May-2018

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 28-May-2018

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - RA 34/2018: The appeal by Huchamma and Ramaiah challenging a November 2017 judgment from the Principal Senior Civil Judge Court, Ramanagara was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Court found that since the total subject matter value was Rs. 37 lakhs (exceeding the 10 lakh rupee threshold), the appeal should be heard by the High Court, not the District Court. The appellants were directed to resubmit their appeal before the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case