S.Parvathi vs Puttaswamy — 34/2013
Case under Order 41 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: Arguments.. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KARN010007372013
Filing Number
34/2013
Filing Date
27-Apr-2013
Registration No
34/2013
Registration Date
27-Apr-2013
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
1020-III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.Parvathi
Adv. K.V.Mohan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Puttaswamy
-
2.N.L.Shamanthamani
-
3.S.Ambika
-
4.S.Sharada
-
5.K.S.Lakshmi
-
6.S.Sudheendra
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Apr-2026
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2025
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2025
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Sep-2025
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Aug-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Oct-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence CIVIL
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2024
Issues
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Issues
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2024
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2023
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2023
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Argument
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Restored
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Summons
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Summons
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2016
JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 34/2013 Outcome: The appeals (R.A.25/2013 and R.A.34/2013) were disposed of by setting aside the trial court's judgment and decree dated 01-03-2013. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal after framing additional issues, particularly regarding Section 4 of the Partition Act and pre-emption rights. Key Findings: The appellate court found that while the plaintiff failed to prove an actual partition of the "A" schedule property between Yashodamma and her son Srinivasa Murthy, the plaintiff had successfully proven purchase of the "B" schedule property under a registered sale deed dated 20-12-2004. The trial court's judgment was deemed erroneous for failing to frame proper issues and provide adequate findings on critical points, particularly regarding pre-emption rights and valuation procedures under partition law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2016
Disposed
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2016
Judgments
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Jan-2016
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2015
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2015
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2015
Arguments.
III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Jun-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
31-Mar-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2015
A.D.R.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2015
A.D.R.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2015
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2014
Arguments.
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2014
Hearing
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2014
Hearing
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2014
Summons
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jun-2014
Summons
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2014
Summons
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Dec-2013
Notice
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2013
Notice
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Aug-2013
Notice
I Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2013
Summary of Case 34/2013 Outcome: The appeals (R.A.25/2013 and R.A.34/2013) were disposed of by setting aside the trial court's judgment and decree dated 01-03-2013. The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal after framing additional issues, particularly regarding Section 4 of the Partition Act and pre-emption rights. Key Findings: The appellate court found that while the plaintiff failed to prove an actual partition of the "A" schedule property between Yashodamma and her son Srinivasa Murthy, the plaintiff had successfully proven purchase of the "B" schedule property under a registered sale deed dated 20-12-2004. The trial court's judgment was deemed erroneous for failing to frame proper issues and provide adequate findings on critical points, particularly regarding pre-emption rights and valuation procedures under partition law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts