A2 Apsar Ahamed vs RAMANAGAR RURAL PS — 163/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES

CNR: KARN010005162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

RAMANAGAR RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/sec. 303(2), 317(2)

Petitioner(s)

A2 Apsar Ahamed

Adv. K NARASEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

RAMANAGAR RURAL PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

01-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

ORDERS.

18-03-2026

BAIL

16-03-2026

BAIL

13-03-2026

BAIL

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Orders

Summary of Case 163/2026 (Ramanagar Rural PS) Court Decision: The bail application of Apsar Ahamed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita was GRANTED on conditional grounds. The applicant was ordered to deposit Rs. 50,000 as personal bond and provide a surety of equal amount, with conditions including biweekly police station reporting, no intimidation of witnesses, and mandatory court attendance. Key Reasoning: Although the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2) related to vehicle theft, the court found that investigation was substantially complete (location survey, statement recorded, and seizure memo prepared). The court rejected the prosecution's argument that mere pendency of multiple cases against the accused warranted bail denial, citing precedent that only substantive criminal involvement—not volume of cases—justifies bail refusal. As a local resident with fixed assets, the applicant posed no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 163/2026 (Ramanagar Rural PS) Court Decision: The bail application of Apsar Ahamed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita was GRANTED on conditional grounds. The applicant was ordered to deposit Rs. 50,000 as personal bond and provide a surety of equal amount, with conditions including biweekly police station reporting, no intimidation of witnesses, and mandatory court attendance. Key Reasoning: Although the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2) related to vehicle theft, the court found that investigation was substantially complete (location survey, statement recorded, and seizure memo prepared). The court rejected the prosecution's argument that mere pendency of multiple cases against the accused warranted bail denial, citing precedent that only substantive criminal involvement—not volume of cases—justifies bail refusal. As a local resident with fixed assets, the applicant posed no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case