A2 Apsar Ahamed vs RAMANAGAR RURAL PS — 163/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES
CNR: KARN010005162026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
163/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
163/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
RAMANAGAR RURAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A2 Apsar Ahamed
Adv. K NARASEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
RAMANAGAR RURAL PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDERS.
BAIL
BAIL
BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 18-03-2026 | BAIL |
| 16-03-2026 | BAIL |
| 13-03-2026 | BAIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 163/2026 (Ramanagar Rural PS) Court Decision: The bail application of Apsar Ahamed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita was GRANTED on conditional grounds. The applicant was ordered to deposit Rs. 50,000 as personal bond and provide a surety of equal amount, with conditions including biweekly police station reporting, no intimidation of witnesses, and mandatory court attendance. Key Reasoning: Although the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2) related to vehicle theft, the court found that investigation was substantially complete (location survey, statement recorded, and seizure memo prepared). The court rejected the prosecution's argument that mere pendency of multiple cases against the accused warranted bail denial, citing precedent that only substantive criminal involvement—not volume of cases—justifies bail refusal. As a local resident with fixed assets, the applicant posed no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 163/2026 (Ramanagar Rural PS) Court Decision: The bail application of Apsar Ahamed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita was GRANTED on conditional grounds. The applicant was ordered to deposit Rs. 50,000 as personal bond and provide a surety of equal amount, with conditions including biweekly police station reporting, no intimidation of witnesses, and mandatory court attendance. Key Reasoning: Although the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2) related to vehicle theft, the court found that investigation was substantially complete (location survey, statement recorded, and seizure memo prepared). The court rejected the prosecution's argument that mere pendency of multiple cases against the accused warranted bail denial, citing precedent that only substantive criminal involvement—not volume of cases—justifies bail refusal. As a local resident with fixed assets, the applicant posed no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts