Somashekar vs TAVAREKERE PS — 154/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES

CNR: KARN010004762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

154/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

360

Police Station

TAVREKERE PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/sec.309(4), 140(2)

Petitioner(s)

Somashekar

Adv. SRINIVASA D N

Respondent(s)

TAVAREKERE PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

10-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

ORDERS.

26-03-2026

ORDERS.

23-03-2026

BAIL

13-03-2026

BAIL

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Somashekar v. TAVAREKERE PS (154/2026) The court granted bail to Somashekar, accused of allegedly abducting and robbing a 70-year-old woman of her mangalsutra (₹2,50,000) in October 2025. Though the offences under BNS Sections 309(4) and 140(2) are non-bailable and punishable up to 10 years imprisonment, the judge imposed reasonable bail conditions—including a ₹1,00,000 bond with surety—finding the charge sheet already filed and custodial interrogation unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Somashekar v. TAVAREKERE PS (154/2026) The court granted bail to Somashekar, accused of allegedly abducting and robbing a 70-year-old woman of her mangalsutra (₹2,50,000) in October 2025. Though the offences under BNS Sections 309(4) and 140(2) are non-bailable and punishable up to 10 years imprisonment, the judge imposed reasonable bail conditions—including a ₹1,00,000 bond with surety—finding the charge sheet already filed and custodial interrogation unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case