Nagaraju P vs CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS — 144/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482, U/sec.438,of,Cr.P.C. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED/ REJECTED AFTER FULL TRAIL/ HEARING on 16th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES
CNR: KARN010004542026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
144/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
144/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED/ REJECTED AFTER FULL TRAIL/ HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagaraju P
Adv. SHIVARAJU H B
Respondent(s)
CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 08-04-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Nagaraju P. v. CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS (144/2026) The I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara dismissed Nagaraju P.'s anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner, a government school teacher, sought pre-arrest bail fearing false criminal charges related to a property sale dispute where the buyer allegedly failed to pay Rs.25 lakhs of the agreed Rs.49 lakh consideration. The court found no reasonable grounds for apprehension, noting the alleged offences are bailable, triable by lower courts, and no formal police notice had been issued to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Nagaraju P. v. CHANNAPATNA RURAL PS (144/2026) The I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara dismissed Nagaraju P.'s anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner, a government school teacher, sought pre-arrest bail fearing false criminal charges related to a property sale dispute where the buyer allegedly failed to pay Rs.25 lakhs of the agreed Rs.49 lakh consideration. The court found no reasonable grounds for apprehension, noting the alleged offences are bailable, triable by lower courts, and no formal police notice had been issued to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts