Mahalingaiah T V vs HAROHALLI PS — 142/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES
CNR: KARN010004482026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
142/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
142/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
302
Police Station
HAROHALLI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahalingaiah T V
Adv. R.SHIVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
HAROHALLI PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 812-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDERS.
BAIL
BAIL
BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 13-03-2026 | BAIL |
| 10-03-2026 | BAIL |
| 06-03-2026 | BAIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 142/2026 The District and Sessions Court in Ramanagara granted conditional bail to petitioner Mahalingaiah T V under CrPC Section 483. The petitioner was arrested for allegedly cultivating six cannabis plants on his land in Harohalli taluk, with 5.32 kg of cannabis seized. The court found that while the charges under NDPS Act Sections 8(b) and 20(a)(i) are non-bailable, the petitioner qualified for conditional bail as a local resident with stable property and no flight risk. The court imposed conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, a surety of equal amount, surrender of identity documents, non-intimidation of witnesses, and non-involvement in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 142/2026 The District and Sessions Court in Ramanagara granted conditional bail to petitioner Mahalingaiah T V under CrPC Section 483. The petitioner was arrested for allegedly cultivating six cannabis plants on his land in Harohalli taluk, with 5.32 kg of cannabis seized. The court found that while the charges under NDPS Act Sections 8(b) and 20(a)(i) are non-bailable, the petitioner qualified for conditional bail as a local resident with stable property and no flight risk. The court imposed conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, a surety of equal amount, surrender of identity documents, non-intimidation of witnesses, and non-involvement in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts