Sikandar vs KUDUR PS — 60/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/Sec.439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES

CNR: KARN010001862026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-01-2026

Filing Number

61/2026

Filing Date

24-01-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

24-01-2026

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA

Judge

1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/ GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

258

Police Station

KUDUR PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section U/Sec.439
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section U/sec. 302, 506, 34
SCHEDULED CASTS AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATTROCITIES) ACT Section U/sec. 3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

Sikandar

Adv. K Vijay Kumar

Respondent(s)

KUDUR PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

01-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

ORDERS.

13-03-2026

ORDERS.

04-03-2026

ORDERS.

25-02-2026

ORDERS.

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.60/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, granted bail to Sikandar (Accused No.2) in a murder case after he spent nearly 6 years in judicial custody. The court found that material witnesses, including the deceased's family members, had already been examined, and prolonged detention without trial violated constitutional rights. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.60/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, granted bail to Sikandar (Accused No.2) in a murder case after he spent nearly 6 years in judicial custody. The court found that material witnesses, including the deceased's family members, had already been examined, and prolonged detention without trial violated constitutional rights. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court attendance, non-contact with witnesses, and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case