STATE BY RAMANAGARA TOWN PS vs SAJU @ SIBGATHULLA KHAN Advocate - Shivaswamy S — 14/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,354,504,506,34. Status: EVIDENCE CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KARN010001602023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
14/2023
Filing Date
19-01-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
19-01-2023
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
RAMANAGAR TOWN PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY RAMANAGARA TOWN PS (Police Station)
Adv. P.P.
Respondent(s)
SAJU @ SIBGATHULLA KHAN Advocate - Shivaswamy S
SHAFIZ
Adv. Shivaswamy S
SADIQ
Adv. Shivaswamy S
Hearing History
Judge: 1001-I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 11-12-2025 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 10-10-2025 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 18-07-2025 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Spl.C.14/2023 On 13.03.2026, the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Ramanagara, heard witness examination (PW-8) in this case involving a complaint filed on 05.07.2022 (Crime No. 75/2022). The defense counsel challenged the witness's credibility regarding a one-day delay between the alleged incident and the complaint filing, questioning why this delay was not mentioned in the FIR. The court admitted the witness's statement and testimony proceeded. The case file was adjourned to Clause 14 for further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Spl.C.14/2023 On 13.03.2026, the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Ramanagara, heard witness examination (PW-8) in this case involving a complaint filed on 05.07.2022 (Crime No. 75/2022). The defense counsel challenged the witness's credibility regarding a one-day delay between the alleged incident and the complaint filing, questioning why this delay was not mentioned in the FIR. The court admitted the witness's statement and testimony proceeded. The case file was adjourned to Clause 14 for further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts