A1 Sheetal Siddarama Sollapuri vs RAMANAGARA CEN CRIME PS — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED/ REJECTED AFTER FULL TRAIL/ HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - Criminal MISC. CASES
CNR: KARN010000212026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA
Judge
1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED/ REJECTED AFTER FULL TRAIL/ HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
CEN (CYBER, ECONOMIC AND NARCOTICS) CRIME PS,RAMANAGARA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A1 Sheetal Siddarama Sollapuri
Adv. K Thimmegowda
A2 Ravinayak
Adv. K Thimmegowda
Respondent(s)
RAMANAGARA CEN CRIME PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1020-III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.6/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sheetal Siddarama Sollapuri and Ravinayak under Section 482 of BNSS-2023. The accused faced charges for hacking the E-Karmika Labour Department website, forging documents, and offenses under IT Act Sections 66, 66(C), and 66(D), with a charge sheet already filed. The court found that since the alleged offenses carry imprisonment of less than 7 years and court summons had been issued, the accused could seek bail directly before the trial court without requiring anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.6/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sheetal Siddarama Sollapuri and Ravinayak under Section 482 of BNSS-2023. The accused faced charges for hacking the E-Karmika Labour Department website, forging documents, and offenses under IT Act Sections 66, 66(C), and 66(D), with a charge sheet already filed. The court found that since the alleged offenses carry imprisonment of less than 7 years and court summons had been issued, the accused could seek bail directly before the trial court without requiring anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts