EXCISE POLICE vs P NAGARAJU — 1950/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section SEC,32(1),38(A),43,OF,KE,ACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS710031392025
Filing Number
1953/2025
Filing Date
20-Sep-2025
Registration No
1950/2025
Registration Date
20-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
1207-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXCISE POLICE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.P NAGARAJU
-
2.UNKNOWN
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
05-Feb-2026
ChargeView PDF
Case Summary Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate, T. Narasipura Date: 5 February 2025 | Case No: 1950/2025 Outcome: Charge framed against accused P. Nagaraja (age 52) under Karnataka Excise Act sections 32(1), 38(A), and 43 for illegally transporting 5,400 liters of liquor (whisky/brandy) in vehicle KA-55-R-7303 without proper authorization on 4 November 2024. The accused was informed of the charges and questioned regarding his plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
19-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
28-Nov-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1950/2025
Case Summary Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate, T. Narasipura Date: 5 February 2025 | Case No: 1950/2025 Outcome: Charge framed against accused P. Nagaraja (age 52) under Karnataka Excise Act sections 32(1), 38(A), and 43 for illegally transporting 5,400 liters of liquor (whisky/brandy) in vehicle KA-55-R-7303 without proper authorization on 4 November 2024. The accused was informed of the charges and questioned regarding his plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts