SRI. B.SIDDESH vs SMT. CHANDRAMMA — 227/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS710021342025

Filing Number

227/2025

Filing Date

22-Jul-2025

Registration No

227/2025

Registration Date

22-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

451-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. B.SIDDESH

    Adv. B M NAGABHUSHANAMURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. CHANDRAMMA

  2. 2.SMT. SAVITHRAMMA

  3. 3.SRI. KUMARA

  4. 4.SRI. RAMESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    On 14.03.2026, the Lok Adalath accepted the plaintiff B. Siddesh's memo and dismissed the suit as not pressed. The court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalath

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Summons Defendent

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Summons Defendent

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Summons Defendent

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Summons Defendent

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Summons Defendent

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  10. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 227/2025

casestatus.in Summary

On 14.03.2026, the Lok Adalath accepted the plaintiff B. Siddesh's memo and dismissed the suit as not pressed. The court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case