SMT. VENKATAMMA vs SRI. H.B.CHANNABASAVANNA — 205/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,R/W,SEC,151,OF,CPC. Status: FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710019842024
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
205/2024
Filing Date
22-07-2024
Registration No
205/2024
Registration Date
22-07-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. VENKATAMMA
Adv. SRI. S. JAYADEVANNA
SRI. SURESHA
SRI. HONNAIAH
SMT. CHOWDAMMA
SMT. HONNAMMA
SMT. BHAGYAMMA
Respondent(s)
SRI. H.B.CHANNABASAVANNA
Hearing History
Judge: 451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
ORDERS
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 23-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 20-02-2026 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION | |
| 19-02-2026 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint in a specific performance of contract suit. The amendment was permitted on payment of Rs. 500 cost, with the plaintiff required to furnish the amended plaint by March 7, 2026. The court found the proposed amendment did not alter the suit's nature or cause of action and was necessary to establish the plaintiff's case without causing injustice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint in a specific performance of contract suit. The amendment was permitted on payment of Rs. 500 cost, with the plaintiff required to furnish the amended plaint by March 7, 2026. The court found the proposed amendment did not alter the suit's nature or cause of action and was necessary to establish the plaintiff's case without causing injustice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts