SRI. RAVI vs SRI. NINGANNA B RATHOD — 1426/2022

Case under Others Section U/S,200CRPC,R/W,SEC,138,NI,ACT. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS710018532022

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1423/2022

Filing Date

09-03-2022

Registration No

1426/2022

Registration Date

09-03-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR

Acts & Sections

OTHERS Section U/S,200CRPC,R/W,SEC,138,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

SRI. RAVI

Adv. SATHISH .H.R.

Respondent(s)

SRI. NINGANNA B RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR

18-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

19-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

22-08-2022
Orders
21-09-2022
Deposition
17-12-2022
Deposition
26-12-2022
313 Statement
28-04-2023
Deposition
05-08-2023
Deposition
23-01-2024
Deposition
09-12-2025
Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (CC 1426/2022) from a Karnataka court heard on 09.12.2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding property ownership and income claims in a property dispute. The witness testified about land holdings, agricultural income, and financial documents related to the case. The court found inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding income claims, tax returns, and loan eligibility, noting that the income figures presented contradicted actual tax documentation from 2015-2017. The proceedings remain ongoing for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (CC 1426/2022) from a Karnataka court heard on 09.12.2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding property ownership and income claims in a property dispute. The witness testified about land holdings, agricultural income, and financial documents related to the case. The court found inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding income claims, tax returns, and loan eligibility, noting that the income figures presented contradicted actual tax documentation from 2015-2017. The proceedings remain ongoing for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case