CHANDRAMMA vs MARAMMA — 217/2018
Case under Others Section UNDER,SEC,9,26,READ,WITH,ORDER,VII,RULE,1,CPC. Status: FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710012222018
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
215/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
217/2018
Registration Date
26-09-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRAMMA
Adv. MADAPPA
SIDDARAJU
MAHADEVA
MAHESHA
CHANDRI
BAGHYA
APPAJI
Respondent(s)
MARAMMA
REVANNA
SAPPAIAH
JAYAMMA
SIDDAPAJI
SHIVAMMA
SUNDRAMMA
PATELA
SHEKARA
SAVITHEA
M.MAHADEVANAYAYKA
PUTTAMADANAYAKA
Hearing History
Judge: 451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
ORDERS
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 06-02-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 28-11-2025 | ORDERS | |
| 20-11-2025 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION | |
| 06-11-2025 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.No.217/2018 | Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, T.Narasipura | Dated: 06.02.2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' Interlocutory Application (I.A.No.VI) seeking permission to amend the plaint to correct typographical errors. The court found that the proposed amendments do not change the nature of suit or cause of action, are necessary to establish the plaintiffs' case, and would not cause injustice to defendants. The application was allowed on payment of cost of Rs.500, and plaintiffs were directed to furnish the amended plaint by 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.No.217/2018 | Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, T.Narasipura | Dated: 06.02.2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' Interlocutory Application (I.A.No.VI) seeking permission to amend the plaint to correct typographical errors. The court found that the proposed amendments do not change the nature of suit or cause of action, are necessary to establish the plaintiffs' case, and would not cause injustice to defendants. The application was allowed on payment of cost of Rs.500, and plaintiffs were directed to furnish the amended plaint by 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts