B.Siddaraju vs Smt. Chikkathayamma — 198/2015
Case under U/sec. 9, 26 R/w Order 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Section -. Status: WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710010522015
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
198/2015
Filing Date
07-07-2015
Registration No
198/2015
Registration Date
07-07-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.Siddaraju
Adv. SRI. A.L. SHABBIRAHMED
Respondent(s)
Smt. Chikkathayamma
Chikkaraju
Shivashankara
Nagesha
Mahesha
Smt. Chikka Mahadevamma
Smt. Lakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
CALL ON
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | WRITTEN STAT/OBJECTION | |
| 07-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 21-02-2026 | CALL ON | |
| 21-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a money recovery suit (O.S./198/2015). The amendment sought to add details about deceased Chikkaiah's relationship to the defendants and properties he left behind, as directed by the appellate court during remand. The court found the amendment necessary for determining the real issues in controversy and rejected the defendants' objections based on changes to the Hindu Succession Act, holding that allowing the amendment would not prejudice the defendants' defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a money recovery suit (O.S./198/2015). The amendment sought to add details about deceased Chikkaiah's relationship to the defendants and properties he left behind, as directed by the appellate court during remand. The court found the amendment necessary for determining the real issues in controversy and rejected the defendants' objections based on changes to the Hindu Succession Act, holding that allowing the amendment would not prejudice the defendants' defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts