R. VENKATACHALAIAH vs SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA Advocate - A.P.S. — 254/2009
Case under U/sec. 9, 26 R/w Order 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Section --. Status: CALL ON. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710007512009
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
09-12-2009
Registration No
254/2009
Registration Date
09-12-2009
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. VENKATACHALAIAH
Adv. S.J.
Respondent(s)
SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA Advocate - A.P.S.
FAZLUL HAQUE
SIDDAIAH
THAYYABUNNISA
IMDAD AHMED
ASIFULLA
SRI.DAS
SIDDARAJU
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BYRAPURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH BYRAPURA VILLAGE, T.NARASIPURA
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH,
Hearing History
Judge: 1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
CALL ON
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | CALL ON | |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET | |
| 17-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLANTIFF/PET |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal complaint (CC 243/2024) filed by Mahadevu against Yathish for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused allegedly borrowed Rs. 70,000 in February 2019 and issued a post-dated cheque that was returned for insufficient funds in May 2019, with no payment made despite notice of dishonour. The document shows the accusation has been read and explained to the accused, but the accused's responses to the plea questions and the final court order are blank/incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal complaint (CC 243/2024) filed by Mahadevu against Yathish for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused allegedly borrowed Rs. 70,000 in February 2019 and issued a post-dated cheque that was returned for insufficient funds in May 2019, with no payment made despite notice of dishonour. The document shows the accusation has been read and explained to the accused, but the accused's responses to the plea questions and the final court order are blank/incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts