M/S, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED.REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER vs SRI. RAVIKUMAR M.L — 96/2021
Case under Others Section U/S,9,26,R/W,ORDER,7,RULE,1,CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710007132021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
96/2021
Filing Date
08-04-2021
Registration No
96/2021
Registration Date
09-04-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED.REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
Adv. SRI. MADAPPA
Respondent(s)
SRI. RAVIKUMAR M.L
SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR M.L
SRI. LOHITH KUMAR M.L
SRI. MAHADEVA V
1(a) SHOBHA
1(b) LASYA R GOWDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1207-I Addl CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
CROSS OF PW
SUMMONS DEFENDENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 28-01-2026 | CROSS OF PW | |
| 01-12-2025 | SUMMONS DEFENDENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at T.Narasipura decreed Karnataka Bank's suit partly, ordering the defendants to pay Rs.4,96,588/- (the outstanding loan principal and accrued interest) along with 6% per annum interest from the suit filing date until realization. The court found that defendants 1-3 had borrowed Rs.3,50,000/- in 2016 for agricultural purposes with defendant 4 as guarantor, but failed to repay despite the loan becoming a Non-Performing Asset in 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at T.Narasipura decreed Karnataka Bank's suit partly, ordering the defendants to pay Rs.4,96,588/- (the outstanding loan principal and accrued interest) along with 6% per annum interest from the suit filing date until realization. The court found that defendants 1-3 had borrowed Rs.3,50,000/- in 2016 for agricultural purposes with defendant 4 as guarantor, but failed to repay despite the loan becoming a Non-Performing Asset in 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts