MANJULA vs NAGARAJU — 43/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 26 AND ORDER 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710003572022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
43/2022
Filing Date
11-02-2022
Registration No
43/2022
Registration Date
11-02-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJULA
Adv. MAHESHA
ASHA RANI
USHA RANI
ANUSHA RANI
Respondent(s)
NAGARAJU
NATARAJU
MAHESHA
ANANDA
MAHESHA
Hearing History
Judge: 451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 18-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court declared that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of a 0.03 guntas property (Sy.No.193/8) at Kannahalli village, based on a registered sale deed from 1999 to the plaintiff's late husband, which passed to them as legal heirs. The court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession, rejecting the defendants' contention that the property does not exist, as documentary evidence clearly established its existence and the plaintiffs' ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court declared that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of a 0.03 guntas property (Sy.No.193/8) at Kannahalli village, based on a registered sale deed from 1999 to the plaintiff's late husband, which passed to them as legal heirs. The court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession, rejecting the defendants' contention that the property does not exist, as documentary evidence clearly established its existence and the plaintiffs' ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts