NINGAMMA vs RENUKA.V. — 54/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7RULE1R/W/S.26OFCPC. Status: Summons Defendent. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710003052026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
1207-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NINGAMMA
Adv. Madhu T S
-
2.RANGASWAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.RENUKA.V.
-
2.KUMUDA
-
3.KALPANA.V.
-
4.HEMALATHA
-
5.C.M.REKHA
-
6.C M SHANTHABHUSHAN
-
7.C M SHASHIBHUSHAN
-
8.SURABHI
-
9.PAVAN C S
-
10.BASAVARAJU
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Summons Defendent
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
23-Apr-2026
Written Stat/Objection
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
17-Mar-2026
Written Stat/Objection
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
16-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 54/2026 Summary: Ningamma and Rangaswamy filed a suit against Renuka.V., Kumuda, and Kalpana.V. seeking declaration of property rights. They also sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from alienating the suit property. The court found the plaintiffs had not established a prima facie case for temporary injunction at this stage and rejected the injunction request. The court issued emergent notice on the injunction application and suit summons to defendants, with the case returnable before the Additional Civil Judge at T.Narasipura for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
Issue Emergent Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
11-Feb-2026
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2026
Case 54/2026 Summary: Ningamma and Rangaswamy filed a suit against Renuka.V., Kumuda, and Kalpana.V. seeking declaration of property rights. They also sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from alienating the suit property. The court found the plaintiffs had not established a prima facie case for temporary injunction at this stage and rejected the injunction request. The court issued emergent notice on the injunction application and suit summons to defendants, with the case returnable before the Additional Civil Judge at T.Narasipura for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts