MOHAMMED REEHAN vs REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, BANNUR. — 75/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS710002622026

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

451-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED REEHAN

    Adv. VINAY B K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, BANNUR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Orders

    In Criminal Miscellaneous Case 75/2026, petitioner Mohammed Reehan's petition against the Registrar, Birth and Death, Bannur was dismissed as not pressed. Although the petitioner was absent, his counsel submitted that the petitioner did not wish to proceed with the petition, leading to its dismissal by the T. Narasipura court. The court ordered return of all documents to the petitioner or counsel in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    To Hear

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Tirumakudal Narsipur

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Miscellaneous Case 75/2026, petitioner Mohammed Reehan's petition against the Registrar, Birth and Death, Bannur was dismissed as not pressed. Although the petitioner was absent, his counsel submitted that the petitioner did not wish to proceed with the petition, leading to its dismissal by the T. Narasipura court. The court ordered return of all documents to the petitioner or counsel in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case