NARAYANI vs SMT. NANJAMMANI — 25/2012
Case under Others Section UNDERSECTION26ANDUNDERORDER7RULE1OFC.P.C.. Status: JUDGEMENTS. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS710001272012
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
25/2012
Filing Date
19-01-2012
Registration No
25/2012
Registration Date
19-01-2012
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA
Judge
451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARAYANI
Adv. SRI. B.M. NAGABHUSHANAMURTHY
SIDDAMADHU
R.SRINIVAS
Respondent(s)
SMT. NANJAMMANI
Hearing History
Judge: 451-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPUR
JUDGEMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
CROSS OF PW
CROSS OF PW
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW | |
| 05-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (OS 25/2012) in Kannada. The court examined witness testimony regarding land ownership and survey documents (S.No. 62/1 containing 4 acres 18 gunthas). The court found that the plaintiff filed a false case with fabricated evidence and dishonest witness statements to illegally seize the defendant's property. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding no credible documentary support for the ownership claims and concluding the case was motivated by malicious intent to dispossess the defendant of his land. The case is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (OS 25/2012) in Kannada. The court examined witness testimony regarding land ownership and survey documents (S.No. 62/1 containing 4 acres 18 gunthas). The court found that the plaintiff filed a false case with fabricated evidence and dishonest witness statements to illegally seize the defendant's property. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding no credible documentary support for the ownership claims and concluding the case was motivated by malicious intent to dispossess the defendant of his land. The case is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts