Mysuru Women PS vs Kizar Ahmed — 2111/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S,498A,504,506,of,IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS700038262022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2113/2022

Filing Date

01-12-2022

Registration No

2111/2022

Registration Date

01-12-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE TIRUMAKUDAL NARASIPUR

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

WOMEN PS,MYSURU RURAL

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section U/S,498A,504,506,of,IPC

Petitioner(s)

Mysuru Women PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Kizar Ahmed

Hearing History

Judge: 553-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE TIRUMAKUDAL NARASIPUR

07-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

FOR COMPLIANCE

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

EVIDENCE

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court acquitted Kizar Ahamed of charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 504, 506 (dowry harassment, insult, and criminal threat) and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3, 4, 6. The key reasoning was that the sole prosecution witness (P.W.1), who was the first informant and the alleged victim, completely denied the prosecution's case both in examination and cross-examination, leaving no credible evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

05-07-2023
Charge
16-02-2026
Deposition
16-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted Kizar Ahamed of charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 504, 506 (dowry harassment, insult, and criminal threat) and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3, 4, 6. The key reasoning was that the sole prosecution witness (P.W.1), who was the first informant and the alleged victim, completely denied the prosecution's case both in examination and cross-examination, leaving no credible evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case