B M NATARAJU vs NINGANNA Advocate - B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY — 140/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS700017292025

Filing Number

141/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

140/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,RULE,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B M NATARAJU

    Adv. SATISH H R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NINGANNA Advocate - B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  2. 2.JAYAMMA

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  3. 3.VIJAYALAKSHMI

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  4. 4.GEETHA

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  5. 5.MAHESH KUMAR N.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  6. 6.MAHADEVA

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  7. 7.GOWRAMMA

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  8. 8.VIJAY KUMAR M.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  9. 9.CHETHAN KUMAR M.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  10. 10.SHIVANNA E.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  11. 11.HEMA

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  12. 12.ISHWARYA S.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

  13. 13.PRAKASH S.

    Adv. B.M. MAHADEVASWAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalah court allowed the compromise petition filed by B M Nataraju against respondents Ninganna Advocate, B.M. Mahadevaswamy, Jayamma, and Vijayalakshmi, finding the settlement agreement legally valid under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court directed the office to draw a decree as per the compromise petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalath

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    For Compliance

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 140/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalah court allowed the compromise petition filed by B M Nataraju against respondents Ninganna Advocate, B.M. Mahadevaswamy, Jayamma, and Vijayalakshmi, finding the settlement agreement legally valid under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court directed the office to draw a decree as per the compromise petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case