CHENNAMMA vs M. RAMANNA DEAD BY LRS A) M.R. BADARINATH — 52/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 41,R,1AND 2. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAMS700010702024

Filing Number

50/2024

Filing Date

31-Aug-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

10-Sep-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 41,R,1AND 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHENNAMMA

    Adv. SRI. A.P.SHREEDHARA

  2. 2.SWAMY

  3. 3.RAMAKRISHNA

  4. 4.KRISHNEGOWDA

  5. 5.A.P. RAVINDRA

  6. 6.KAMALAMMA

  7. 7.SHIVALINGU

  8. 8.NINGARAJU

  9. 9.RANGEGOWDA

  10. 10.SWAMY

  11. 11.JAYAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. RAMANNA DEAD BY LRS A) M.R. BADARINATH

  2. 2.B) M.R. MANJUNATH

  3. 3.C) KARAGANNA DEAD BY LRS a) LOKESHA

  4. 4.b) ABHISHEK

  5. 5.c) POOJA

  6. 6.d) HEMALATHA DEAD BY LRS

  7. 7.d

  8. 8.(a) Y.S. SHEKARA

  9. 9.d1(b) SNEHA

  10. 10.d1(c) SANJANA

  11. 11.e) JYOTHI

  12. 12.3. SHIVANNA DEAD BY LRS a) JAYAMMA

  13. 13.b) SHEELA

  14. 14.c) SHILPA

  15. 15.d) SHYLAJA

  16. 16.e) KANCHANA ALIAS SHILPA

  17. 17.4. PAPANNA

  18. 18.5. KRISHNEGOWDA

  19. 19.6.THAYAMMA DEAD BY LRS a) RAJU

  20. 20.7.NINGAMMA ALIAS KARAGAMMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Chennamma and Others v. M. Ramanna (D) and Others Case Number: R.A. Nos. 52 & 61/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge, T. Narasipura Date of Judgment: 01.04.2026 Decision The appellate court reversed and dismissed the entire suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral properties. The court held that all disputed properties were subject to an oral family partition in 1957, and plaintiffs failed to rebut the presumption that an admitted partial partition extends to all joint family properties. Key Outcome: - R.A. No. 52/2024 (Plaintiffs' appeal): DISMISSED - R.A. No. 61/2024 (Defendants' appeal): ALLOWED - Trial court's partial decree granting shares in items 2-4 was reversed; dismissal of claim for item 1 was upheld Core Reasoning The court found that while the trial court granted plaintiffs a half-share in three properties (items 2-4), it erred in ignoring clear evidence that an oral partition in 1957 had divided all family properties between the two branches. The court noted: admitted or proven partial partitions legally presume division of all joint family assets unless rebutted with sufficient evidence—which plaintiffs failed to provide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgements

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Further Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Further Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  13. 01-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  17. 17-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  18. 26-Nov-2024

    Call On

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  19. 11-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 31-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chennamma and Others v. M. Ramanna (D) and Others Case Number: R.A. Nos. 52 & 61/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge, T. Narasipura Date of Judgment: 01.04.2026 Decision The appellate court reversed and dismissed the entire suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral properties. The court held that all disputed properties were subject to an oral family partition in 1957, and plaintiffs failed to rebut the presumption that an admitted partial partition extends to all joint family properties. Key Outcome: - R.A. No. 52/2024 (Plaintiffs' appeal): DISMISSED - R.A. No. 61/2024 (Defendants' appeal): ALLOWED - Trial court's partial decree granting shares in items 2-4 was reversed; dismissal of claim for item 1 was upheld Core Reasoning The court found that while the trial court granted plaintiffs a half-share in three properties (items 2-4), it erred in ignoring clear evidence that an oral partition in 1957 had divided all family properties between the two branches. The court noted: admitted or proven partial partitions legally presume division of all joint family assets unless rebutted with sufficient evidence—which plaintiffs failed to provide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case