MAHADEVAPPA H.N. vs SHIVANNA Advocate - GNANENDRA MURTHY .N.S — 84/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,R,1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS700009942025

Filing Number

83/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

84/2025

Registration Date

22-Jul-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,R,1AND2

Petitioner(s)

1.MAHADEVAPPA H.N.

Adv. K K Nandish
2.SAVITHA

Respondent(s)

1.SHIVANNA Advocate - GNANENDRA MURTHY .N.S
2.KUMAR H.N.

Adv. GNANENDRA MURTHY .N.S

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

The court allowed the compromise petition filed by Mahadevappa H.N. and Savitha against Shivanna Advocate and others, finding the compromise agreement legally valid under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court directed the office to draw a decree as per the compromise petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
03-Mar-2026

Lok Adalath

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
17-Feb-2026

Settlement

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
04-Feb-2026

Settlement

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
21-Jan-2026

Settlement

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
26-Nov-2025

Await Report

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
29-Oct-2025

Written Stat/Objection

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
03-Sep-2025

Written Stat/Objection

Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur
23-Jul-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Jul-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 84/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the compromise petition filed by Mahadevappa H.N. and Savitha against Shivanna Advocate and others, finding the compromise agreement legally valid under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court directed the office to draw a decree as per the compromise petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.