VIJAYA vs N. VISHAKANTAIAH — 18/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,R/W,SEC,26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS700003602019

Filing Number

18/2019

Filing Date

25-Apr-2019

Registration No

18/2019

Registration Date

25-Apr-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,R/W,SEC,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYA

    Adv. SRI GNANENDRA MURTHY .N.S

  2. 2.LAKSHMI C

  3. 3.JAYASHREE

  4. 4.K.C. ANAND, MINOR R/BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER VIJAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N. VISHAKANTAIAH

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 18/2019 Summary On 10.11.2025, a witness oath was administered in this property dispute case. The respondent (defendant) testified regarding ownership of disputed agricultural and residential properties. He claimed that properties were purchased in his son-in-law's name in 1984, later registered under his mother's account, and that he and his brother have possessed certain survey plots since 2002 following an oral partition. The witness denied producing sale deeds and maintained the petitioners lack ownership rights, asserting they are entitled to relief based on his mother's name appearing on the revenue records. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Further Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  19. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    Cross Of Dw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  21. 02-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 02-Apr-2025

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  23. 10-Mar-2025

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  24. 03-Feb-2025

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  25. 06-Jan-2025

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  26. 02-Dec-2024

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  27. 11-Nov-2024

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  28. 30-Sep-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  29. 18-Sep-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  30. 28-Aug-2024

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  31. 23-Jul-2024

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  32. 10-Jun-2024

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  33. 15-Apr-2024

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  34. 18-Mar-2024

    Defendent Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  35. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  36. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  37. 11-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  38. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  39. 15-Jun-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  40. 15-Jun-2023

    Further Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  41. 31-May-2023

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  42. 22-May-2023

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  43. 28-Feb-2023

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  44. 03-Feb-2023

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  45. 23-Nov-2022

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  46. 15-Oct-2022

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  47. 17-Sep-2022

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  48. 19-Aug-2022

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  49. 21-Jul-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  50. 21-Jul-2022

    Cross Of Pw

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  51. 02-Jul-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  52. 02-Jul-2022

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  53. 17-Jun-2022

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  54. 03-Jun-2022

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  55. 24-Mar-2022

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  56. 04-Mar-2022

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  57. 25-Feb-2022

    For Amendment Plantiff/Pet

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  58. 04-Dec-2021

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  59. 08-Oct-2021

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  60. 27-Jul-2021

    IssueView PDF

  61. 27-Jul-2021

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  62. 10-Jun-2021

    For Compliance

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  63. 10-May-2021

    For Compliance

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  64. 19-Mar-2021

    For Compliance

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  65. 03-Feb-2021

    Conciliation

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  66. 17-Nov-2020

    Call On

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  67. 06-Oct-2020

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  68. 12-Aug-2020

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  69. 15-Jun-2020

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  70. 27-Jan-2020

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  71. 18-Nov-2019

    Plantiff Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  72. 14-Oct-2019

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  73. 09-Sep-2019

    Written Stat/Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  74. 08-Jul-2019

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  75. 14-Jun-2019

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  76. 25-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 25-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case 18/2019 Summary On 10.11.2025, a witness oath was administered in this property dispute case. The respondent (defendant) testified regarding ownership of disputed agricultural and residential properties. He claimed that properties were purchased in his son-in-law's name in 1984, later registered under his mother's account, and that he and his brother have possessed certain survey plots since 2002 following an oral partition. The witness denied producing sale deeds and maintained the petitioners lack ownership rights, asserting they are entitled to relief based on his mother's name appearing on the revenue records. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case