NANJAIAH vs TAHASILDAR — 74/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 1969.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS700002692026

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIRUMAKUDAL NARSIPURA

Judge

553-Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 1969.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANJAIAH

    Adv. B RAJU

  2. 2.BASAVANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 74/2026 The court allowed the petition filed by Nanjaiah and Basavanna under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of their mother, Puttamadamma (who died on 20.03.1972), in the death register. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, genealogical records, and newspaper publications announcing the death, and noted that no one contested the petition despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge Tirumakudal Narasipur

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 74/2026 The court allowed the petition filed by Nanjaiah and Basavanna under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of their mother, Puttamadamma (who died on 20.03.1972), in the death register. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, genealogical records, and newspaper publications announcing the death, and noted that no one contested the petition despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case