SANTHOSHA vs JAYANNA Advocate - M E P — 313/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section UO7R1CPC. Status: Appearance Of Party. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Appearance Of Party Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS610051002022

Filing Number

321/2022

Filing Date

12-Sep-2022

Registration No

313/2022

Registration Date

12-Sep-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section UO7R1CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTHOSHA

    Adv. MAHENDRA S S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYANNA Advocate - M E P

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 313/2022 Petitioner: Santhosha Respondent: Jayanna Advocate - M E P Court: Principal Civil Judge, Periyapattan Outcome: Cross-examination of PW-1 (witness) completed. The witness was recalled on 12.01.2026 and examined regarding a disputed sale agreement dated 01.02.2021 involving tobacco cultivation. The court recorded the witness's testimony on key issues including: the authenticity of the sale deed with Rs. 100 stamp duty, the transaction amount of Rs. 1 lakh 80 thousand, discrepancies in signatures, and allegations of fabricated documents. The court noted contradictions between the witness's oral testimony and written statements, and questioned whether a fraudulent deed was created to support a false claim. The examination revealed that the property was allegedly sold to a third party, making the petitioner's claim questionable. Status: Case adjourned for further proceedings after completion of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  15. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  17. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  19. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  20. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  21. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  22. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  23. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  24. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  25. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  26. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  27. 29-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  28. 16-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  30. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  31. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  32. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  33. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  34. 05-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  35. 19-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  36. 04-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  37. 02-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  38. 01-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  39. 29-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  40. 10-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  41. 10-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  42. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  43. 12-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  44. 14-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  45. 14-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  46. 14-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  47. 14-Sep-2022

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  48. 13-Sep-2022

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  49. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 12-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 313/2022 Petitioner: Santhosha Respondent: Jayanna Advocate - M E P Court: Principal Civil Judge, Periyapattan Outcome: Cross-examination of PW-1 (witness) completed. The witness was recalled on 12.01.2026 and examined regarding a disputed sale agreement dated 01.02.2021 involving tobacco cultivation. The court recorded the witness's testimony on key issues including: the authenticity of the sale deed with Rs. 100 stamp duty, the transaction amount of Rs. 1 lakh 80 thousand, discrepancies in signatures, and allegations of fabricated documents. The court noted contradictions between the witness's oral testimony and written statements, and questioned whether a fraudulent deed was created to support a false claim. The examination revealed that the property was allegedly sold to a third party, making the petitioner's claim questionable. Status: Case adjourned for further proceedings after completion of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case