MANJUNATHA vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 761/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS610031972025
Filing Number
762/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
761/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJUNATHA
Adv. S.N.GIRISHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Manjunatha v. The Tahsildar, Periyapatna (Crl. Misc. 761/2025) The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death particulars of late Mugamma (wife of late Kempanayaka), who died on 24.04.1944 in Kelaganahalli Village, Periyapatna. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by a non-availability certificate and genealogical evidence established that the death record was not available in the respondent's registers. The petitioner was directed to pay applicable late fees for the registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
24-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 761/2025
Case Summary: Manjunatha v. The Tahsildar, Periyapatna (Crl. Misc. 761/2025) The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death particulars of late Mugamma (wife of late Kempanayaka), who died on 24.04.1944 in Kelaganahalli Village, Periyapatna. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by a non-availability certificate and genealogical evidence established that the death record was not available in the respondent's registers. The petitioner was directed to pay applicable late fees for the registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts