CHANDREGOWDA vs JAVAREGOWDA Advocate - C P MAHESHA — 52/2018
Case under U/o 21 Rule 1 of C.p.c Section UO21R1CPC. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS610021782018
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
57/2018
Filing Date
09-10-2018
Registration No
52/2018
Registration Date
09-10-2018
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDREGOWDA
Adv. M C HARISH
Respondent(s)
JAVAREGOWDA Advocate - C P MAHESHA
BHAGYAMMA
MUTTHURAJU
SATHISHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Call on
Call on
Call on
for Objection
for Objection
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 17-01-2026 | Call on | |
| 06-12-2025 | Call on | |
| 15-11-2025 | for Objection | |
| 28-10-2025 | for Objection |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Interlocutory Application I.A.No.II filed under Order VII Rule 14 of CPC by the petitioner (Dhr) to permit filing of documents with condonation of delay was allowed. The court found the documents relevant to the partition petition and necessary parties (Dhr No.2-4) were identified, granting both parties opportunity to present their case. Costs of Rs.300/- were imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Interlocutory Application I.A.No.II filed under Order VII Rule 14 of CPC by the petitioner (Dhr) to permit filing of documents with condonation of delay was allowed. The court found the documents relevant to the partition petition and necessary parties (Dhr No.2-4) were identified, granting both parties opportunity to present their case. Costs of Rs.300/- were imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts