BETTADAPURA PS vs Venkatesha Alias Pratapa Advocate - DHANAPAL — 623/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,341,323,324,326,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Aug-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS610018702023

e-Filing Number

01-12-2023

Filing Number

624/2023

Filing Date

01-Dec-2023

Registration No

623/2023

Registration Date

01-Dec-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

1319-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0177

Police Station

BETTADAPURA PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 504,341,323,324,326,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BETTADAPURA PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Venkatesha Alias Pratapa Advocate - DHANAPAL

  2. 2.Krishnegowda Alias Kittappa

    Adv. DHANAPAL

Case History

  1. 03-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC. 623/2023 Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge and District Court, Piriyapatna Parties: Bettadapura PS (Petitioner) v. Venkatesha Alias Pratapa Advocate - Dhanapal and Krishnegowda Alias Kittappa (Respondents) Outcome: The case proceeded with witness examination. A witness (Girish Prasad, age 49) testified regarding events of 23.09.2023 when police allegedly seized items under Nipi-4 procedure. The court recorded the witness statement and noted that the Assistant Government Advocate requested permission to treat the witness as hostile, which was granted. No final order on merits was pronounced; the case appears to be in the examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  9. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  13. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  14. 12-May-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  16. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  17. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  18. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  19. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  20. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  21. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  22. 23-May-2024

    Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  23. 01-Apr-2024

    Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  24. 26-Feb-2024

    Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  25. 19-Jan-2024

    Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  26. 02-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 01-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 623/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC. 623/2023 Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge and District Court, Piriyapatna Parties: Bettadapura PS (Petitioner) v. Venkatesha Alias Pratapa Advocate - Dhanapal and Krishnegowda Alias Kittappa (Respondents) Outcome: The case proceeded with witness examination. A witness (Girish Prasad, age 49) testified regarding events of 23.09.2023 when police allegedly seized items under Nipi-4 procedure. The court recorded the witness statement and noted that the Assistant Government Advocate requested permission to treat the witness as hostile, which was granted. No final order on merits was pronounced; the case appears to be in the examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case