RUKKANAMMA vs BOREGOWDA Advocate - B.N.HARISH — 287/2020
Case under U/o 7 Rule I of C.p.c Section UO7R1OFCPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS610018292020
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
288/2020
Filing Date
09-12-2020
Registration No
287/2020
Registration Date
09-12-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUKKANAMMA
Adv. S M PURUSHOTHAMA
Respondent(s)
BOREGOWDA Advocate - B.N.HARISH
SHIVANNEGOWDA
Adv. B.N.HARISH
SANNATHAYAMMA
Adv. B.N.HARISH
RATNAMMA
Adv. B.N.HARISH
DEELIP
Adv. B.N.HARISH
SHIVAMMA
Adv. B.N.HARISH
RAGHU
Adv. B.N.HARISH
CHITRA
Adv. B.N.HARISH
Hearing History
Judge: 452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
EVIDENCE
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In civil suit OS 287/2020, the court examined disputed land ownership claims involving multiple parties. The court found that the plaintiff has established ownership of 2 acres of land through credible evidence and testimony, while rejecting the defendants' testimony as false and unreliable. The case proceeded with witness examination on 16.03.2026, and the court's findings favored the plaintiff's claim to the disputed property based on the established facts and boundary descriptions presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In civil suit OS 287/2020, the court examined disputed land ownership claims involving multiple parties. The court found that the plaintiff has established ownership of 2 acres of land through credible evidence and testimony, while rejecting the defendants' testimony as false and unreliable. The case proceeded with witness examination on 16.03.2026, and the court's findings favored the plaintiff's claim to the disputed property based on the established facts and boundary descriptions presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts