BETTADAPURA PS vs PRASHANTHA. A.P Advocate - C S MANJUNATHASWAMY — 613/2019
Case under Mines and Minerals Act Section 420IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS610017942019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
615/2019
Filing Date
25-04-2019
Registration No
613/2019
Registration Date
25-04-2019
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
BETTADAPURA PS
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BETTADAPURA PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRASHANTHA. A.P Advocate - C S MANJUNATHASWAMY
Hearing History
Judge: 1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 09-02-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-01-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 420 and Essential Commodities Act Sections 3 and 7, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution alleged the accused illegally hoarded and sold rationed rice and wheat meant for poor cardholders, but witness testimony was inconsistent, lacking corroboration from ground-level officials or photographic evidence. The court noted insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt despite formal police investigation and seizure of 13.47 quintals of rice and 12.16 quintals of wheat on June 18, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 420 and Essential Commodities Act Sections 3 and 7, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution alleged the accused illegally hoarded and sold rationed rice and wheat meant for poor cardholders, but witness testimony was inconsistent, lacking corroboration from ground-level officials or photographic evidence. The court noted insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt despite formal police investigation and seizure of 13.47 quintals of rice and 12.16 quintals of wheat on June 18, 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts